There are a trio of interesting articles to challenge ourselves with first this week: first from Cathy O’Neil via CNN (and other sources) about how math is racist and algorithms and big data are helping to perpetuate the poverty gap. From targeted advertising and insurance to education and policing, O’Neil looks at how algorithms and big data are targeting the poor, reinforcing racism and amplifying inequality in her new book “Weapons of Math Destruction.” Second up is one where researchers found that when artificial intelligence judges a beauty contest, white people win. The why and the how behind racial preference is being programmed in to the AI platforms is what’s interesting. Those first articles and the thought process that follows then brings into question the last, or at least, the real impact that artificial intelligence has on customer service – there is a great deal of potential, for sure, but companies have to be wary that their AI doesn’t then created a different, biased experience based on race and gender.
Vanity Fair this week has an exclusive look at how the Theranos house of cards came tumbling down. It’s a story of silos and secrecy, among other things, and how silos and secrecy got in the way of any defense Theranos and Holmes, the founder, could mount.
Speaking of broken cultures, Inc. has an article this week about startup culture being broken and what to do about it now.
While there is some question as to the all-powerful nature of the mighty Blockchain, this article from Bloomberg unpacks what magical properties it might have.
With the Rio Olympics having come to a close, we get to the real question of the day: if we were to hold the Olympics of Programming today, which country would win and what would the US’s medal ranking be? You’re likely not surprised to discover it isn’t even close to the top ten. Not that it needs reinforcement, but we need to add coding to the curriculum earlier in the US.
While Uber is dominant by a wide margin in the US market, there are others out there seeing success in Europe and elsewhere, like Gett, an Israeli ride sharing company that looks to strengthen its hold on Europe and slowly make its way into the US.
As we awake to news of an earthquake off the shores of North Korea, it might bring to mind “the big one” we all fear – most people think of the San Andreas fault or if you’re from the Midwest, like me, the New Madrid fault line. The New Yorker has an article on another: the Cascadia subduction. It’s a really well written piece with a good look at the science and impact of that big one.
Many of us have heard about the “great experiment” at companies like Medium, Zappos, and GitHub in holocracy, where an organization is completely flat and there are no leaders. There are champions and detractors alike, and one of those champions was Chris Wanstrath of GitHub, which started as a bossless culture in 2008 but who two years ago gathered the employees of his software startup to inform them they were all getting bosses. That said, GitHub still pushes the traditional structure and is experimenting as they can and holocracy at Zappos has for all intents and purposes failed – just ask those leaving the company. The obvious bigger question lies around how big is too big for a completely flat structure and when do the benefits get outweighed by the faults?
Popular Science does a great job profiling Chris White, the man who lit the dark web, this week, and how data mining is helping cops bust open online human trafficking. On the subject of online predators, if you’re a parent (or not), take the time to read this article about the subject from the Washington Post.
There’s a pair of articles this week from Bloomberg about the state of the world economy this week: first, how manufacturing and now services are signaling fractures in the US economy and then how Saudi Arabia is on a cost-cutting spree looking to cut $20 billion in projects this year due to slow economic growth and low oil prices.
John Kotter’s name comes up frequently in the world of business and with good reason given his impact on how we run organizations and get organizations to change. Organizational change management can be a tough nut to crack even when you have intent about it (and organizations fail to change when they ignore it), and this week strategy+business asked Kotter what his required reading was when it comes to change, and the list is short but insightful. Also from s+b this week is this article on fostering online trust.
Well, the unthinkable has come to pass: the FCC has abandoned the set top box in favor of apps. It’s not a surprising shift, just surprising that a government entity is an early adopter of sorts. This shift should be a boon for consumers and cable providers alike. Time will tell.
So, headphone jacks. That seems to be the big news everyone is taking away from the Apple event Wednesday and with good reason. While there are proponents and detractors, one of the bigger complaints is how one can’t charge their phone while using corded headphones. Maybe Apple is becoming a company focused solely on increasing revenue and not innovation anymore, but recall that when the original iPod came out it didn’t work with most headphone because the jack was set so deeply in the device. That changed, and it’s likely that wireless charging is what we can expect with the iPhone 8.
Ransomware continues to be an epidemic, but enSilo has a plan that should eliminate 70% of those attacks – learn more from Fortune.
There’s an interesting article from Fast Company about how Microsoft is trying to find and hire autisctic coders.
Last this week is an opinion piece this week outlining how the robot overlords aren’t, in fact, bearing down on us nor will the implementation of robots lead to mass unemployment as some naysayers have claimed. While an opinion, there is plenty of data to back it up through the article. Thea reality is that the robots are coming and we need to start planning and training our workforces now to avoid the feared obsolescence of the future. Along with that, The Guardian explores how our three life stages will not survive much longer.
Speaking of progress, the politics around any progress brings about risk in many ways and on many levels. Instead of avoiding that risk, however, journalist Jonathan Tepperman says we might even want to think riskier. He traveled the world to ask global leaders how they’re tackling hard problems — and unearthed surprisingly hopeful stories that he’s distilled into three tools for problem-solving featured in this TED talk.